Pee Vee's Writings

.

Outward sign

Off the Wall

February 19, 2009


 
   In less than a week, Ash Wednesday will mark the beginning of Lent for 2009. Christians all over the world will be attending Mass on Wednesday, February 25, to take part in the annual tradition of receiving ashes on their foreheads in shape of a cross. This outward sign serves to remind us all that we are sinners and have need for penance. The ashes also symbolize our mortality, a reminder that one day we will die and our bodies will return to dust.
   According to the American Catholic website, "The tradition of receiving ashes has its origins in the Old Testament, where sinners performed acts of public penance. "It also mentioned this holy day of obligation is marked by abstinence and fasting for Catholics. "Catholics older than the age of 14 are supposed to abstain from meat. In addition, those between the ages of 18 and 59, not including pregnant or nursing mothers, should eat only one full meal. Smaller amounts of food ­ not as much as a full meal ­ may be eaten in the morning and either at lunchtime or dinner, depending on when you eat your full meal," it explained. With the above being said, I began thinking and something hit me. If Ash Wednesday is supposed to be a day of fasting and abstinence, then why are Catholics permitted to eat on full meal a day?
   I contacted Reverend Michael Sikon from the Diocese of Greensburg, a priest whom has been most helpful to me in the past. He told me, "You are correct that the current discipline of the Church states that those between 18-59 are obliged to fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday. Fasting is further defined as one meal. This specific definition of "Fast" was codified with the 1917 Code of Canon Law."
   Continuing on, he emphasized, "For those who strictly interpret the word, in the Church's usage, to fast means to 'restrict' one's intake of food. That is most likely the practice that was understood in biblical time. Thus, fasting means a form of penance."
   Here is one aspect of which I was unfamiliar. Sikon pointed out, "While the Church permits of food during a fast, it does not require that one do so. It does depend upon the spirit with which the discipline is embraced." He went on by adding, "Undoubtedly, the Church's practice changed over time because the discipline no longer brought about the intended affect. As a penitential practice it serves to attune us to the presence of God in our lives and in our world. It makes us grow in appreciation of God's goodness and the abundance of his gifts. It promotes greater awareness of our brothers and sisters in need, and prompts our ready response. These spiritual disciplines are difficult or impossible to mandate. Among a small, intentional community, there might be a shared awareness of such matters. But, to instill among millions, such an understanding is difficult; perhaps impossible. Most likely the practice was reformed because people no longer were able to make those connections. Fasting was no long a means to an end, but had become an end in and of itself," he said.
   In the 1966 Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul VI, Paenitemini, he allowed that fasting and abstinence also be substituted with prayer and works of charity. As former Director of Evangelization of Holy Family Church, Latrobe, Christopher Cuddy noted, "Fasting is to be done in a spirit of charity. Thus, the Church understands that although it is a day of fasting and abstinence, the food is not the primary thing. It is about the heart. In short, the Church (as always) gives gentle restrictions and prescriptions for our behavior (things we really have to do), but it also leaves enough room for us to make whatever we do an act of love." Now that is good wisdom for this Lenten season.
 
 
Paul J. Volkmann
Written: January 13, 2009

.

Back | Writings Menu | Next

.

Domain created © 10 / 2002 v2

Home Page